From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Layman v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON TACOMA DIVISION
Oct 20, 2011
Civil No. 3:11-CV-05490-RBL-JRC (W.D. Wash. Oct. 20, 2011)

Opinion

Civil No. 3:11-CV-05490-RBL-JRC

10-20-2011

NATHAN S. LAYMAN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER AMENDING THE

SCHEDULING ORDER

Based on Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 20), and that Plaintiff's Counsel has no opposition, it is hereby ORDERED that the Scheduling Order shall be amended as follows:

• Defendant shall have up to and including November 25, 2011, to file Defendant's responsive brief;
• Plaintiff shall have up to and including December 9, 2011, to file a reply brief; and
• Oral argument, if desired, shall be requested by December 16, 2011.

J. Richard Creatura

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Layman v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON TACOMA DIVISION
Oct 20, 2011
Civil No. 3:11-CV-05490-RBL-JRC (W.D. Wash. Oct. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Layman v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:NATHAN S. LAYMAN, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON TACOMA DIVISION

Date published: Oct 20, 2011

Citations

Civil No. 3:11-CV-05490-RBL-JRC (W.D. Wash. Oct. 20, 2011)