From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lay v. Quick

United States District Court, Eastern District of Oklahoma
Oct 31, 2023
Civ. 23-326-RAW-DES (E.D. Okla. Oct. 31, 2023)

Opinion

Civ. 23-326-RAW-DES

10-31-2023

WADE LAY, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTIE QUICK, Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

RONALD A. WHITE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

On September 25, 2023, Plaintiff Wade Lay, a death-sentenced state prisoner, filed this action titled “Impediment Clause Impetus” in the United State District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma (Dkt. 1). While Plaintiff alleged this action falls under the habeas statutes, 28 U.S.C. § 2244 and 28 U.S.C. § 2255, the Western District construed the action as arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Dkt. 5 at 1). The Western District found Plaintiff was alleging that prison officials were denying him access to the courts with respect to his upcoming competency hearing and his filing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Id. Because Plaintiff is incarcerated in the Eastern District of Oklahoma, the case was transferred to this district. Id.

ACCORDINGLY, Plaintiff is directed to submit within twenty (20) days a proper civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on this Court's form, along with a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or $402.00 for the filing fee. The Court Clerk is directed to send Plaintiff the proper forms for proceeding in this action. Failure to comply with this Order will result in dismissal of this action without further notice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lay v. Quick

United States District Court, Eastern District of Oklahoma
Oct 31, 2023
Civ. 23-326-RAW-DES (E.D. Okla. Oct. 31, 2023)
Case details for

Lay v. Quick

Case Details

Full title:WADE LAY, Plaintiff, v. CHRISTIE QUICK, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 31, 2023

Citations

Civ. 23-326-RAW-DES (E.D. Okla. Oct. 31, 2023)