From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lay v. Pacific Perforating Co.

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Mar 23, 1944
63 Cal.App.2d 452 (Cal. Ct. App. 1944)

Opinion

Docket No. 3121.

March 23, 1944.

APPLICATION for a writ of supersedeas. Dismissed.

Sidney A. Moss for Appellants.

Claflin Chain for Respondent.


[1] A petition for writ of supersedeas was filed by defendants and appellants pending the appeal in the above entitled case. An order to show cause was issued and pending the hearing thereof all proceedings on the judgment were stayed conditioned that defendants file a sufficient bond in the sum of $6828. Such a bond was filed. The appeal from the judgment was decided adversely to defendants. ( Lay v. Pacific Perforating Co., Ltd., 62 Cal.App.2d 233 [ 144 P.2d 395].) A hearing was subsequently denied by the Supreme Court. That judgment has become final. The question presented under the writ has become moot.

Petition dismissed.

Barnard, P.J., and Marks, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Lay v. Pacific Perforating Co.

Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District
Mar 23, 1944
63 Cal.App.2d 452 (Cal. Ct. App. 1944)
Case details for

Lay v. Pacific Perforating Co.

Case Details

Full title:WILETTA LAY, Respondent, v. PACIFIC PERFORATING COMPANY, LTD., (a…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 23, 1944

Citations

63 Cal.App.2d 452 (Cal. Ct. App. 1944)
146 P.2d 923

Citing Cases

In re Truong

Numerous other decisions have likewise concluded mootness requires dismissal of an appellate challenge to an…

In re Field

Numerous other decisions have likewise concluded mootness requires dismissal of an appellate challenge to an…