From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lay v. Friedman

United States District Court, N.D. California
Dec 5, 2008
No. C 03-4408 RMW (PR) (N.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2008)

Opinion

No. C 03-4408 RMW (PR).

December 5, 2008


ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 23)


Good cause appearing, defendant's request for an extension of time to file a motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Defendant shall file a dispositive motion on or before January 30, 2009. Plaintiff's opposition will be due thirty days thereafter, and defendants shall file a reply brief within 15 days of the date any opposition is filed by plaintiff.

This order terminates docket no. 23.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lay v. Friedman

United States District Court, N.D. California
Dec 5, 2008
No. C 03-4408 RMW (PR) (N.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2008)
Case details for

Lay v. Friedman

Case Details

Full title:ELWIN K. LAY, II, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL L. FRIEDMAN, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: Dec 5, 2008

Citations

No. C 03-4408 RMW (PR) (N.D. Cal. Dec. 5, 2008)

Citing Cases

El-Aheidab v. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.

A Rule 12(b)(5) motion is the proper vehicle for challenging the mode of delivery or lack of delivery of the…