From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lax Elecs. v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Jun 7, 2022
No. 2021-2374 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 7, 2022)

Opinion

2021-2374

06-07-2022

LAX ELECTRONICS, INC., DBA AUTOMATIC CONNECTOR, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee

Justin Huffman, Camardo Law Firm, P.C., Auburn, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Elizabeth Anne Speck, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by Brian M. Boynton, Deborah Ann Bynum, Patricia M. McCarthy.


Note: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:19-cv-01668-EGB, Senior Judge Eric G. Bruggink.

Justin Huffman, Camardo Law Firm, P.C., Auburn, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

Elizabeth Anne Speck, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by Brian M. Boynton, Deborah Ann Bynum, Patricia M. McCarthy.

JUDGMENT

This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged:

Per Curiam (Moore, Chief Judge, Taranto and Stark, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

Lax Elecs. v. United States

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Jun 7, 2022
No. 2021-2374 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Lax Elecs. v. United States

Case Details

Full title:LAX ELECTRONICS, INC., DBA AUTOMATIC CONNECTOR, Plaintiff-Appellant v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Jun 7, 2022

Citations

No. 2021-2374 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 7, 2022)