From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lawton v. Mahoney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION
Mar 14, 2012
CV-11-81-BU-RFC-CSO (D. Mont. Mar. 14, 2012)

Opinion

CV-11-81-BU-RFC-CSO

03-14-2012

TAMMY L. LAWTON, Plaintiff, v. MIKE MAHONEY; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On December 5, 2011, Petitioner Tammy Lawton, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this action seeking a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Subsequent Orders of this Court have all been returned as undeliverable because failed to keep the Court apprised of her current address. Docs. 3, 5-7, & 9. Accordingly, United States Magistrate Judge Ostby has recommended the petition for habeas corpus be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule of Procedure 5.2(b). Not surprisingly, Lawton did not file objections to Judge Ostby's Findings and Recommendations within 14 days as required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Lawton's Petition (doc. 1) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;
2. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter, by separate document, a judgment of dismissal; and
3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

______________

RICHARD F CEBULL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Lawton v. Mahoney

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION
Mar 14, 2012
CV-11-81-BU-RFC-CSO (D. Mont. Mar. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Lawton v. Mahoney

Case Details

Full title:TAMMY L. LAWTON, Plaintiff, v. MIKE MAHONEY; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION

Date published: Mar 14, 2012

Citations

CV-11-81-BU-RFC-CSO (D. Mont. Mar. 14, 2012)