From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lawton v. Ludwick

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 6, 2013
CASE NO. 10-10048 (E.D. Mich. May. 6, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 10-10048

05-06-2013

THEODORE LEE LAWTON, Petitioner, v. NICK LUDWICK, Respondent.


HONORABLE GEORGE CARAM STEEH


ORDER DENYING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR

ORAL ARGUMENT AND APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

Petitioner Theodore Lee Lawton has filed a pro se habeas corpus petition challenging his Kent County convictions for armed robbery and felony firearm. He alleges that: (1) he and his family and friends were led to believe that the public could not be present during voir dire at his second trial; (2) he was denied a fair trial when the jury was permitted to view photographs of him holding a handgun; (3) defense counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge a search warrant that was supported by an affidavit containing obvious falsehoods; (4) a detective destroyed portions of a recorded telephone conversation and also withheld information about the recording for nearly six months, and defense counsel was ineffective for failing to seek suppression of the recording; (5) defense counsel was ineffective at sentencing for failing to argue that the language for offense variable seven of the sentencing guidelines is vague; and (6) appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise issues two through five in Petitioner's appeal of right.

Currently pending before the Court is Petitioner's motion for oral argument and appointment of counsel. Petitioner alleges that he is unable to retain counsel and that oral argument would assist the Court in reaching a decision on the complex issues raised in his brief.

There is no constitutional right to counsel in a habeas corpus proceeding, Post v. Bradshaw, 422 F.3d 419, 425 (6th Cir. 2005), and appointment of counsel in a civil case such as this one "is justified only in exceptional circumstances." Lanier v. Bryant, 332 F.3d 999, 1006 (6th Cir. 2003). Petitioner has demonstrated his ability to represent himself, and the parties' pleadings adequately set forth and argue the issues. Consequently, there is no need for oral arguments or appointment of counsel, and Petitioner's motion [Doc. #21, filed on January 2, 2013] is DENIED.

____________

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE


Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record on

May 6, 2013, by electronic and/or ordinary mail and also on

Theodore Lawton #254897, Bellamy Creek Correctional

Facility, 1727 West Bluewater Highway, Ionia, MI 48846.

Barbara Radke

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Lawton v. Ludwick

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
May 6, 2013
CASE NO. 10-10048 (E.D. Mich. May. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Lawton v. Ludwick

Case Details

Full title:THEODORE LEE LAWTON, Petitioner, v. NICK LUDWICK, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: May 6, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 10-10048 (E.D. Mich. May. 6, 2013)