Summary
In Lawton, the administrative record before the ALJ "contain[ed] neither a physical RFC assessment nor a medical source statement pertaining to plaintiff's physical capabilities, let alone one from a treating source."
Summary of this case from Little v. ColvinOpinion
1:08-CV-0137 (LEK/DEP).
September 2, 2009
DECISION AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on August 17, 2009 by the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.3(d) of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 14). After ten days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the entire file to the undersigned, including the objections by the Defendant, which were filed on August 31, 2009. Objections (Dkt. No. 15).
It is the duty of this Court to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). "A [district] judge . . . may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." Id. This Court has considered the objections and has undertaken a de novo review of the record and has determined that the Report-Recommendation should be approved for the reasons stated therein.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 14) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further
ORDERED, that Defendant's Motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED; and it is further
ORDERED, that Plaintiff's Motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED in part, the Commissioner's determination of no disability is VACATED and the matter is REMANDED to the agency for further consideration in accordance with the Report-Recommendation; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.