From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lawson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 29, 1982
409 So. 2d 181 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 81-2227.

January 29, 1982.

Appeal pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) from Circuit Court, Hillsborough County; Arden Mays Merkle, Judge.


Appellant's counsel stipulated that the trial judge could sentence appellant as a habitual felony offender, however, the trial judge failed to set forth findings for the imposition of the enhanced sentence as envisioned by section 775.084, Florida Statutes (1979). Appellant was then sentenced to twenty-five years imprisonment for escape. Appellant appeals from the enhanced sentence.

The judgment is affirmed but the case is remanded for the imposition of a new sentence accompanied by the necessary findings as specified by section 775.084. In addition to appellant's counsel's stipulation, the written judgment and sentence should reflect that appellant was sentenced as a habitual felony offender.

SCHEB, C.J., and DANAHY and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lawson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 29, 1982
409 So. 2d 181 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Lawson v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARK A. LAWSON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 29, 1982

Citations

409 So. 2d 181 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Lee v. State

This affords the defendant an opportunity for meaningful appellate review. Lawson v. State, 409 So.2d 181…

Cavallaro v. State

Pursuant to section 775.084(3)(d), the trial court must make findings of fact that demonstrate on their face…