From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lawson v. Certified Grocers

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 1, 1988
531 So. 2d 985 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. BT-139.

September 1, 1988.

Petition for review from the Deputy Commissioner, Elwyn M. Akins.

Dorothy Clay Sims of Chalkley Sims, Ocala, for appellant.

Jack A. Langdon of Langdon McCarty, Gainesville, for appellees.


We affirm the deputy commissioner's order denying Lawson's claim for additional medical treatment beyond the follow-up care at the Miami Pain Clinic voluntarily provided by the employer/carrier. However, we reverse the order insofar as it denied ongoing psychiatric treatment inasmuch as there is no competent substantial evidence to support such denial.

The deputy's reliance upon Dr. Rosomoff, a neurosurgeon and director of the Miami Pain Clinic, for the conclusion that the claimant was not in need of further psychiatric treatment is erroneous. Dr. Henderson, claimant's treating psychiatrist, who had been seeing claimant with the consent of the employer/carrier, testified that the claimant had not yet reached maximum medical improvement from a psychiatric standpoint and that the claimant was at risk of severe decompensation if psychiatric treatment were discontinued. On cross-examination, Dr. Rosomoff effectively deferred to Dr. Henderson's judgment regarding the necessity for ongoing psychiatric treatment.

AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part and REMANDED for the entry of an amended order consistent with this opinion.

ERVIN and JOANOS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lawson v. Certified Grocers

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 1, 1988
531 So. 2d 985 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Lawson v. Certified Grocers

Case Details

Full title:RAYMON A. LAWSON, APPELLANT, v. CERTIFIED GROCERS AND CRUMP SPECIAL…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Sep 1, 1988

Citations

531 So. 2d 985 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Lerman v. Broward Cty. Bd. of Com'rs

Therefore, in light of the rule that the vantage point of the reviewing court is not inferior to that of the…