From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laws v. Ranger Realty Co.

Supreme Court of Florida
May 9, 1933
148 So. 583 (Fla. 1933)

Opinion

Opinion filed May 9, 1933.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, M. G. Rowe, Judge.

J. U. Gillespie and Fullerton Duss, for Appellant;

Scarlett Futch, for Appellees.


This was a suit brought by the Ranger Realty Company to foreclose a tax sale certificate issued by the City of New Smyrna to a corporation, The Covington Trust Banking Company, as purchaser, whose name was given in the certificate as Covington Bank Trust Company. The Covington Trust Banking Company had assigned the certificate to Ranger Realty Company.

The court below held that where a tax certificate was purchased by a corporation, the misnomer of the corporation in the certificate was not a fatal defect, in view of Section 6047 C. G. L., 4116 R. G. S. That ruling must be affirmed on authority of what was recently decided by us in Sweet v. Ranger Realty Company, 108 Fla. 146 Sou. Rep. 199.

The case of Carr v. Kissimmee, 80 Fla. 756, 86 Sou. Rep. 699, holding that a court of equity may not order reformation of a tax certificate is still followed in this jurisdiction, but has no application to the case of a misnomer of a corporation as purchaser of a tax certificate, since no reformation of the certificate is essential under the statute, Section 6047 C. G. L., 4116 R. G. S., to enable the corporation to sue in its true name when proper allegations are made to show the fact of a misnomer in the instrument relied on as a basis for the suit.

Affirmed.

WHITFIELD, TERRELL, BROWN and BUFORD, J. J., concur.

ELLIS, J., dissents.


Summaries of

Laws v. Ranger Realty Co.

Supreme Court of Florida
May 9, 1933
148 So. 583 (Fla. 1933)
Case details for

Laws v. Ranger Realty Co.

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM LAWS, SR., v. RANGER REALTY COMPANY, a Florida corporation…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: May 9, 1933

Citations

148 So. 583 (Fla. 1933)
148 So. 583

Citing Cases

American Ladder & Scaffold Co. v. Miami Ventilated Awning Co.

However, it is apparent that any such proposed amendment would not be an alteration of the written agreement…