From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lawrence v. Palmer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 3, 2009
59 A.D.3d 394 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 2007-11141.

February 3, 2009.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Nelson, J.), dated November 19, 2007, which denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 3215 for leave to enter judgment against the defendant upon her failure to interpose a timely answer, and, in effect, granted the defendant's application to compel the plaintiffs to accept her late answer.

Leahey Johnson, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Peter James Johnson, Peter James Johnson, Jr., James P. Tenney, Joanne Filiberti, and Rosa M. Batista of counsel), for appellants.

Picciano Scahill, P.C., Westbury, N.Y. (Gilbert J. Hardy and Francis J. Scahill of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Fisher, J.P., Covello, Balkin and Belen, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs' motion for leave to enter a default judgment and, in effect, granting the defendant's application to compel the plaintiffs to accept her late answer, thereby excusing her delay in serving it ( see CPLR 2004, 3012 [d]). Considering the lack of any prejudice to the plaintiffs as a result of the short delay, the defendant's showing of a reasonable excuse for the delay, the existence of a potentially meritorious defense, and the public policy favoring the resolution of cases on the merits, the Supreme Court properly excused the defendant's delay in answering ( see Falla v Keel Holdings, LLC, 50 AD3d 844, 845; A C Constr. Inc. of N.Y. v Flanagan, 34 AD3d 510).


Summaries of

Lawrence v. Palmer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 3, 2009
59 A.D.3d 394 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Lawrence v. Palmer

Case Details

Full title:ROSELLA LAWRENCE et al., Appellants, v. NORA L. PALMER, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 3, 2009

Citations

59 A.D.3d 394 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 651
871 N.Y.S.2d 920

Citing Cases

Youngstown Tube Co. v. Russo

The Court, as a preliminary matter, begins its analysis with its recognition of the longstanding articulated…

Sidoti v. Mayerson Assoc

The parties already had been engaged in contesting the merits of the plaintiffs claims in various forums, and…