From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lawrence v. Endovascular Technologies, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Sep 19, 2005
Case No. 5:03-CV-04920 (N.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2005)

Opinion

Case No. 5:03-CV-04920.

September 19, 2005

JACK B. McCOWAN, JR., LINDA L. NUSSER, GORDON REES LLP, San Francisco, CA, MICHAEL L. O'DONNELL, Pro Hac Vice CRAIG R. MAY, Pro Hac Vice WHEELER TRIGG KENNEDY LLP, Denver, CA, Attorneys for Defendants.

LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN BERNSTEIN, LLP, WENDY R. FLEISHMAN, Pro Hac Vice Attorneys for Plaintiffs.


STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL


IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lawrence v. Endovascular Technologies, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Sep 19, 2005
Case No. 5:03-CV-04920 (N.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2005)
Case details for

Lawrence v. Endovascular Technologies, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:OPHELIA LAWRENCE and WALTER LAWRENCE, Plaintiffs, v. ENDOVASCULAR…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Sep 19, 2005

Citations

Case No. 5:03-CV-04920 (N.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2005)