Lawrence v. City of Englewood

Full title: WILLIAM LAWRENCE, TERESA FEKANY, COLORADO CROSS-DISABILITY COALITION…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Nov 28, 2012

Civil Action No.: 12-CV-01423-MSK-BNB (D. Colo. Nov. 28, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No.: 12-CV-01423-MSK-BNB

11-28-2012

WILLIAM LAWRENCE, TERESA FEKANY, COLORADO CROSS-DISABILITY COALITION, COLORADO ASSOCIATION OF THE DEAF, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO, including its police department, and GRAYSON ROBINSON, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Arapahoe County, Colorado, Defendants.

Boyd N. Boland

Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER

This matter arises on the Parties' Joint Motion to Amend Scheduling Order [Doc. # 51, filed November 20, 2012] (the "Motion to Amend").

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Amend is GRANTED. The following Scheduling Order deadlines and limitations are amended as follows:

+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Deadline or Limitation ¦Prior Deadline or Limitation ¦Amended Deadline or Limitation ¦ +------------------------+------------------------------+--------------------------------¦ ¦Discovery Cut-off ¦February 7, 2013 ¦March 1, 2013 ¦ +------------------------+------------------------------+--------------------------------¦ ¦Affirmative Rule 26(a) ¦November 21, 2012 ¦January 4, 2013 ¦ ¦(2) Disclosures ¦ ¦ ¦ +------------------------+------------------------------+--------------------------------¦ ¦Rebuttal Rule 26(a)(2) ¦December 21, 2012 ¦February 4, 2013 ¦ ¦Disclosures ¦ ¦ ¦ +------------------------+------------------------------+--------------------------------¦ ¦Plaintiff's Opening ¦ ¦ ¦ ¦Brief in Support of ¦December 7, 2012 ¦January 7, 2013 ¦ ¦Class Certification ¦ ¦ ¦ +------------------------+------------------------------+--------------------------------¦ ¦Limitation on Number of ¦10 ¦20 ¦ ¦Depositions ¦ ¦ ¦ +------------------------+------------------------------+--------------------------------¦ ¦Limitation on Number of ¦25 ¦50 ¦ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+

+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+ ¦Interrogatories for Plaintiffs and Defendant Robinson ¦ ¦ ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+--+--¦ ¦Limitation on Number of Requests for Production for Plaintiffs and ¦25¦50¦ ¦Defendant Robinson ¦ ¦ ¦ +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+

The increase in the numbers of interrogatories and requests for production shall apply only to Plaintiffs seeking discovery against Defendant Robinson and to Defendant Robinson seeking discovery against Plaintiffs, and shall not apply to Defendant Englewood.

BY THE COURT:

________________________

United States Magistrate Judge