From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lawrence Cedarhurst Bank v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 14, 1941
261 App. Div. 1089 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)

Opinion

April 14, 1941.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ.


In an action for a declaratory judgment decreeing that the boundary line of the city of New York is the east and north bounds of the former village of Far Rockaway, as set forth in section 1 of chapter 1 of the Greater New York Charter, as amended, and that part of plaintiff's premises is in Nassau county and part in Queens county, and adjudging that the liens of the city of New York for unpaid taxes and assessments are illegal and void and canceling them, and for other incidental relief, judgment in favor of plaintiff unanimously affirmed, with costs to plaintiff-respondent, and one bill of costs to town of Hempstead and county of Nassau. Order striking out the second, third and fourth separate and distinct defenses and the first, second and third partial defenses of the appellant, City of New York, unanimously affirmed, without costs. No opinion.


Summaries of

Lawrence Cedarhurst Bank v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 14, 1941
261 App. Div. 1089 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)
Case details for

Lawrence Cedarhurst Bank v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE CEDARHURST BANK, Formerly BANK OF LAWRENCE, Respondent, v. CITY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 14, 1941

Citations

261 App. Div. 1089 (N.Y. App. Div. 1941)