From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lawnicki v. Vanderhoof

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Aug 17, 2010
Case No. 10-10297 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 17, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 10-10297.

August 17, 2010


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO AMEND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

Although this motion was originally scheduled for hearing, the Court deems it appropriate for decision without oral argument.See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78(b); E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(f)(2).


This is a tort case. Plaintiffs are suing defendants claiming negligence resulting from an automobile accident in which plaintiffs suffered injuries.

Before the Court is defendants' motion to amend their affirmative defenses. Plaintiffs have not responded. The Court has reviewed defendants' motion and finds it to be well-taken.See Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a); Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178 (1962). Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED.

A Notice of Motion Hearing was sent to all counsel on July 15, 2010, stating that a response was due by July 23, 2010. To date, no response has been filed.

SO ORDERED.

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to the attorneys of record on this date, August 17, 2010, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.


Summaries of

Lawnicki v. Vanderhoof

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Aug 17, 2010
Case No. 10-10297 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 17, 2010)
Case details for

Lawnicki v. Vanderhoof

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL LAWNICKI, and SANDRA LAWNICKI Plaintiffs, v. PAUL VANDERHOOF…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Aug 17, 2010

Citations

Case No. 10-10297 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 17, 2010)