From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lawler v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Apr 25, 1928
5 S.W.2d 770 (Tex. Crim. App. 1928)

Opinion

No. 11829.

Delivered April 25, 1928.

Robbery With Firearms — Escape of Appellant — Appeal Dismissed.

Where it is shown to this court that, pending his appeal, the appellant escaped from the custody of the sheriff, and was not recaptured by the officers until the third day after such escape, under Art. 824, C. C. P., his appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal from the District Court of Midland County. Tried below before the Hon. Chas. L. Klapproth, Judge.

Appeal from a conviction for robbery with firearms, penalty life imprisonment in the penitentiary.

The opinion states the case.

No brief filed for appellant.

A. A. Dawson of Canton, State's Attorney, for the State.


Conviction is for robbery with firearms, punishment being confinement in the penitentiary for life.

For two reasons the appeal will be dismissed. It appears from the affidavit of the sheriff that after conviction appellant assaulted the jailer, made his escape and was not recaptured by the officers until the third day after such escape. By reason of such escape under Art. 824, C. C. P., this court loses jurisdiction of the appeal.

Also there has been filed in this court an affidavit from appellant advising that he does not wish to prosecute his appeal further and requesting that it be dismissed.

For both reasons, the appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.


Summaries of

Lawler v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Apr 25, 1928
5 S.W.2d 770 (Tex. Crim. App. 1928)
Case details for

Lawler v. State

Case Details

Full title:TEAGUE LAWLER v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Apr 25, 1928

Citations

5 S.W.2d 770 (Tex. Crim. App. 1928)
109 Tex. Crim. 510

Citing Cases

Sommerlatte v. State

Article 419, C. C. P., provides: "Upon the filing of an indictment in the district court which charges an…

Smith v. State

To the same effect are other cases cited in Lenzen v. State, supra. In support of his contention appellant…