From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lawal v. FULLBEAUTY Brands, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 16, 2022
22-CV-2639 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 16, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-2639 (RA)

06-16-2022

RAFIA LAWAL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,, Plaintiff, v. FULLBEAUTY BRANDS, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

RONNIE ABRAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

It has been reported to the Court that this case has been settled. Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's docket if the application to restore the action is made within sixty (60) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within sixty (60) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same 60-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lawal v. FULLBEAUTY Brands, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jun 16, 2022
22-CV-2639 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 16, 2022)
Case details for

Lawal v. FULLBEAUTY Brands, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:RAFIA LAWAL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jun 16, 2022

Citations

22-CV-2639 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 16, 2022)