From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Law v. Transit Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 16, 2001
279 A.D.2d 325 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

January 16, 2001.

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Giamboi, J.), entered June 30, 1999, dismissing the complaint at the close of evidence for failure to make out a prima facie case, unanimously affirmed, without costs.


Even assuming that defendant City was negligent in its placement of traffic control signs at the intersection where the accident occurred, the evidence fails to show that such negligence proximately caused the accident. The accident occurred when an unidentified hit-and-run driver illegally changed into plaintiffs' right-hand lane of traffic from a left-turn-only lane of traffic. Plaintiffs' expert opined that the hit-and-run driver's illegal change of lanes was impelled by his sudden and unexpected finding that he was in the wrong lane because of signs that did not give sufficient advance notice that vehicles in the left-hand lane must turn left. This was impermissible speculation where the only evidence of the other driver's actions was plaintiffs' testimony acknowledging unawareness of the other driver's presence until he came up along side plaintiffs' vehicle on the left and moved ahead. There is no reason to assume the signs had causal effect on this particular accident ( see, Cassano v. Hagstrom, 5 N.Y.2d 643, 645-646).


Summaries of

Law v. Transit Auth

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 16, 2001
279 A.D.2d 325 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Law v. Transit Auth

Case Details

Full title:RONALD LAW et al., Appellants, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 16, 2001

Citations

279 A.D.2d 325 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
719 N.Y.S.2d 54

Citing Cases

Sosa v. City of New York

After the respondent, the City of New York, established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter…

Boland v. Montefiore Med. Ctr.

The Court of Appeals has made it clear "that opinion evidence must be based on facts in the record or…