From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Law v. Siege (In re Law)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 23, 2014
748 F.3d 1304 (9th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 09–60046.

2014-04-23

In re Stephen LAW, Debtor. Stephen Law, Appellant, v. Alfred H. Siegel, Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellee.

Stephen Law, Chino, CA, pro se. Steven Todd Gubner, I, Esquire, Ezra Brutzkus Gubner LLP, Woodland Hills, CA, for Appellee.


Stephen Law, Chino, CA, pro se. Steven Todd Gubner, I, Esquire, Ezra Brutzkus Gubner LLP, Woodland Hills, CA, for Appellee.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. BAP No. 09–1077–PaMkH.
Before: HARRY PREGERSON, SIDNEY R. THOMAS, and RICHARD A. PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Pursuant to the opinion of the Supreme Court in Law v. Siegel, –––U.S. ––––, 134 S.Ct. 1188, 188 L.Ed.2d 146 (2014), we vacate our disposition at 435 Fed.Appx. 697 (9th Cir.2011), reverse the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's and bankruptcy court's decisions, and remand to the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel with instructions to remand to the bankruptcy court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.


Summaries of

Law v. Siege (In re Law)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Apr 23, 2014
748 F.3d 1304 (9th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Law v. Siege (In re Law)

Case Details

Full title:IN RE: STEPHEN LAW, Debtor, STEPHEN LAW, Appellant, v. ALFRED H. SIEGE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 23, 2014

Citations

748 F.3d 1304 (9th Cir. 2014)