From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Law v. Gudaitis

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jun 21, 2023
No. C23-5085-JCC-GJL (W.D. Wash. Jun. 21, 2023)

Opinion

C23-5085-JCC-GJL

06-21-2023

BRIAN EDWARD LAW, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY GUDAITIS, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

JOHN C. COUGHENOUR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of Magistrate Judge Grady J. Leupold (Dkt. No. 9), and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 9).

Plaintiff filed a letter to the Court. (Dkt. No. 10.) Objections to an R&R must be specific and focus the Court's attention on the parties' dispute. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 147 (1985). Here, the Court need not consider Plaintiff's arguments in his letter because he fails to make any specific objections to the R&R. (See Dkt. No. 10.)

(2) This case is dismissed without prejudice.

(3) Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 3) is DENIED as moot.

(4) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff and to the Hon. Grady J. Leupold.


Summaries of

Law v. Gudaitis

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Jun 21, 2023
No. C23-5085-JCC-GJL (W.D. Wash. Jun. 21, 2023)
Case details for

Law v. Gudaitis

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN EDWARD LAW, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY GUDAITIS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Jun 21, 2023

Citations

No. C23-5085-JCC-GJL (W.D. Wash. Jun. 21, 2023)