From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Law Offs. of Rosenbaum v. Gateway, Inc.

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 2004
2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 50629 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)

Opinion

570378/03.

Decided June 1, 2004.

Defendant appeals from an order of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court, New York County, entered on or about March 31, 2003 (Joan M. Kenney, J.) which denied defendant's motion to stay the action pending arbitration.

Order entered on or about March 31, 2003 (Joan M. Kenney, J.) reversed, without costs, motion granted, and action stayed pending arbitration.

PRESENT: HON. LUCINDO SUAREZ, P.J., HON. WILLIAM P. McCOOE, HON. PHYLLIS GANGEL-JACOB, Justices.


The arbitration clause in the "Standard Terms of Sale and Limited Warranty Agreement" that accompanied the computer delivered to plaintiff was valid and enforceable ( see Brower v. Gateway 2000, 246 AD2d 246; Hill v. Gateway 2000, 105 F3d 1147, cert denied 522 US 808), and warranted the grant of defendant's motion to stay this small claims action pending arbitration. Plaintiff's assertion that defendant is not entitled to the benefit of the arbitration provision in the sales agreement is inconsistent with plaintiff's underlying claim that defendant is liable to it under the limited warranty set out in the agreement. We note that any application to discontinue the action should be made in the trial court.

This constitutes the decision and order of the court.


Summaries of

Law Offs. of Rosenbaum v. Gateway, Inc.

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 2004
2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 50629 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)
Case details for

Law Offs. of Rosenbaum v. Gateway, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:LAW OFFICES OF CORY J. ROSENBAUM, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. GATEWAY, INC.…

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 1, 2004

Citations

2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 50629 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)

Citing Cases

Scarcella v. America Online

This is particularly so in view of the costs and inconvenience attendant to litigating this claim in…