From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lavorico v. People

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 19, 2009
No. CIV S-09-0418 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-0418 EFB P.

August 19, 2009


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus. See 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

Examination of the in forma pauperis affidavit reveals that petitioner is unable to afford the costs of suit.

A petitioner seeking a writ of habeas corpus must name as respondent the person having custody over him. 28 U.S.C. § 2242; Rule 2(a), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. This person ordinarily is the warden of the facility where petitioner is confined. See Stanley v. California Supreme Court, 21 F.3d 359, 360 (9th Cir. 1994). Petitioner names as respondent The People of California, who do not have custody over petitioner. Petitioner has not named the proper respondent.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted; and,

2. The February 12, 2009, petition is dismissed with leave to file an amended petition naming the proper respondent within 30 days of the date of this order. Petitioner's failure to file an amended petition may result in this action being dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send to petitioner the form Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus used in this court.


Summaries of

Lavorico v. People

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 19, 2009
No. CIV S-09-0418 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2009)
Case details for

Lavorico v. People

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND LAVORICO, Petitioner, v. THE PEOPLE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 19, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-09-0418 EFB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 19, 2009)