From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lavergne v. Paramo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 18, 2015
Case No. EDCV 12-2172-DOC (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 12-2172-DOC (LAL)

11-18-2015

HARRISON LAVERGNE, JR, Petitioner, v. DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Final Report and Recommendation, Petitioner's Objections, and the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination.

Petitioner's Objections lack merit for the reasons stated in the Final Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Final Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;

2. Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice; and
3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.

Additionally, for the reasons stated in the Final Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Thus, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. DATED: November 18, 2015

/s/_________

HONORABLE DAVID O. CARTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

See 28 U.S.C. § 2253; Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336, 123 S. Ct. 1029, 154 L. Ed. 2d 931 (2003).


Summaries of

Lavergne v. Paramo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 18, 2015
Case No. EDCV 12-2172-DOC (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2015)
Case details for

Lavergne v. Paramo

Case Details

Full title:HARRISON LAVERGNE, JR, Petitioner, v. DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 18, 2015

Citations

Case No. EDCV 12-2172-DOC (LAL) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2015)