From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laventall v. Danzig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1933
239 App. Div. 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)

Opinion

May, 1933.

Present — Hill, P.J., Rhodes, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ. [See, ante, p. 864.]


Motion to allow appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. The court certifies that a question of law has arisen which in its opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals, and hereby certifies the following question: Do the separate defense and counterclaim set forth in the answer of the defendants, Louis Danzig and Charlotte Sattler, state facts sufficient to constitute a separate defense and counterclaim? Motion for stay pending the hearing and determination of the appeal granted.


Summaries of

Laventall v. Danzig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 1, 1933
239 App. Div. 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)
Case details for

Laventall v. Danzig

Case Details

Full title:ADAH M. LAVENTALL and FIRST TRUST COMPANY OF ALBANY, Respondents, v. LOUIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 1, 1933

Citations

239 App. Div. 872 (N.Y. App. Div. 1933)