From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lavello v. Danko

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 10, 1959
175 F. Supp. 92 (S.D.N.Y. 1959)

Summary

In Lavello v. Danko, 175 F. Supp. 92 (S.D.N.Y. 1959), a case arising under the Death on the High Seas Act, the libel alleged that the crash of the aircraft at sea was proximately caused by failure to properly inspect and repair the aircraft on shore.

Summary of this case from Weinstein v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.

Opinion

July 10, 1959.

Morris Pinsley, New York City, for libellant.

Newman Katz, New York City, for respondent.


This is a motion to overrule peremptory exceptions to a libel. The action grows out of the crash of an airplane off Block Island, which is alleged to be more than one marine league from the nearest shore of any state. The action was brought in admiralty pursuant to the Death on the High Seas Act. 46 U.S.C.A. § 761 et seq. It is alleged that the death was caused solely as a result of the negligence, default and wrongful act of respondent's decedent in the operation of the airplane, in making faulty repairs and failure to make proper inspection. The exceptions to the libel urge that the alleged negligence, or some of the acts constituting the same, are alleged to have occurred elsewhere than on the high seas and that therefore the allegations of the libel do not give rise to a cause of action within the maritime jurisdiction of this Court.

Certainly some of the allegations of the libel allege negligence over the high seas, such as the allegation that respondent's decedent failed to operate the aircraft so as to avoid contact with the high seas.

In any event the death occurred on the high seas and "the alleged locale of the tortious act places it within the traditional tort jurisdiction of admiralty." Wilson v. Transocean Airlines, D.C.Cal. 1954, 121 F. Supp. 85, 92.

"In applying the `locality' test for admiralty jurisdiction, the tort is deemed to occur, not where the wrongful act or omission has its inception, but where the impact of the act or omission produces such injury as to give rise to a cause of action." Ibid., 121 F. Supp. at page 92.

Even if the tortious conduct of the respondent's decedent occurred within the territorial limits of this State, if the impact of the tortious conduct took place in the air space over the high seas then this Court has jurisdiction under the Death on the High Seas Act. Noel v. Airponents, Inc., D.C.N.J. 1958, 169 F. Supp. 348.

The motion to overrule the exceptions to the libel is granted. So ordered.


Summaries of

Lavello v. Danko

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 10, 1959
175 F. Supp. 92 (S.D.N.Y. 1959)

In Lavello v. Danko, 175 F. Supp. 92 (S.D.N.Y. 1959), a case arising under the Death on the High Seas Act, the libel alleged that the crash of the aircraft at sea was proximately caused by failure to properly inspect and repair the aircraft on shore.

Summary of this case from Weinstein v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.
Case details for

Lavello v. Danko

Case Details

Full title:Florence J. LAVELLO, as Administratrix of the Goods, Chattels and Credits…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 10, 1959

Citations

175 F. Supp. 92 (S.D.N.Y. 1959)

Citing Cases

Weinstein v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.

See D'Aleman v. Pan American World Airways, 259 F.2d 493 (2 Cir. 1958); Wilson v. Transocean Airlines, 121 F.…

Touhey v. Carnivale Cruise Lines

The Death on the High Seas Act, 46 United States Code section 761, provides: "Whenever the death of a person…