From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laveist v. Roberts

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Oct 29, 1953
21 Misc. 2d 785 (N.Y. App. Term 1953)

Opinion

October 29, 1953

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan, MARIO G. DI PIRRO, J.

Jacob S. Schneider for appellant.

John Bradshaw Thorne for respondent.


The landlord testified that the established maximum rent for the apartment nonfurnished is $36.80 per month, but that she had applied to the Rent Administrator for a higher rental for the apartment as furnished accommodations. However, up to the time of the trial no new rental had been fixed or any order issued for an increase. Her own testimony establishes the validity of the tenant's defense of overcharge. The addition of new furniture to a nonfurnished apartment does not create a new housing accommodation which would entitle the landlord to collect a rental in excess of the existing maximum, prior to the issuance of an order by the Rent Administrator. ( Baum v. Crosfield, 279 App. Div. 1088; Strunk v. Hayes, 281 App. Div. 1006; Pereira v. Imperial Apts., 122 N.Y.S.2d 180.)

The final order and judgment should be reversed and new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant to abide the event.

Concur — EDER, SCHREIBER and HECHT, JJ.

Final order and judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Laveist v. Roberts

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Oct 29, 1953
21 Misc. 2d 785 (N.Y. App. Term 1953)
Case details for

Laveist v. Roberts

Case Details

Full title:LAVEIST, Respondent, v. ROBERTS, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Oct 29, 1953

Citations

21 Misc. 2d 785 (N.Y. App. Term 1953)
127 N.Y.S.2d 1

Citing Cases

Johnson v. Peters

While the statute makes provision for changed accommodations, furnishing is not such a change. (State Rent…

Johnson v. Andrews

The established maximum rent during all of this time was $36 per month for the apartment in question,…