Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§

Lavazzoli v. State

408 So. 2d 583 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Depth of Treatment
Newest to Oldest
Oldest to Newest
Cite Count
Lavazzoli v. State

3 Citing cases

  1. State v. Lavazzoli

    434 So. 2d 321 (Fla. 1983)   Cited 86 times
    Holding that "disposition of a case on appeal is made in accordance with the law in effect at the time of the appellate court's decision rather than the law in effect at the time the judgment appealed was rendered" unless a substantive right is altered

    The court extended the original term of probation by one year and imposed a special condition of probation that respondent be incarcerated for a period of three years. Respondent appealed. Lavazzoli v. State, 408 So.2d 583 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). The Third District Court of Appeal concluded that the trial court erred in refusing to consider respondent's motion to suppress.

  2. Wilson v. State

    678 So. 2d 12 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

    Affirmed. See Porras v. State, 651 So.2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Wearen v. State, 570 So.2d 1081 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Lavazzoli v. State, 408 So.2d 583 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), approved by 434 So.2d 321 (Fla. 1983).

  3. Edwards v. State

    439 So. 2d 1028 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)   Cited 16 times

    While this violation is technical in nature, it is sufficient to support revocation of probation. Lavazzoli v. State, 408 So.2d 583, 584 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), approved, 434 So.2d 321 (Fla. 1983). It is also clear that the defendant failed to file any written report for two months. This is a substantial violation of the conditions of probation.