The court extended the original term of probation by one year and imposed a special condition of probation that respondent be incarcerated for a period of three years. Respondent appealed. Lavazzoli v. State, 408 So.2d 583 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). The Third District Court of Appeal concluded that the trial court erred in refusing to consider respondent's motion to suppress.
Affirmed. See Porras v. State, 651 So.2d 183 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Wearen v. State, 570 So.2d 1081 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Lavazzoli v. State, 408 So.2d 583 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), approved by 434 So.2d 321 (Fla. 1983).
While this violation is technical in nature, it is sufficient to support revocation of probation. Lavazzoli v. State, 408 So.2d 583, 584 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), approved, 434 So.2d 321 (Fla. 1983). It is also clear that the defendant failed to file any written report for two months. This is a substantial violation of the conditions of probation.