From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lauterstein v. Nathan Strauss, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)

Opinion

January, 1930.


Order denying motion to require plaintiffs to correct complaint pursuant to rule 102 of the Rules of Civil Practice reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, without costs, with leave to plaintiffs to serve an amended complaint within ten days from service of a copy of the order herein. Defendant could not be liable at one and the same time as a lessee under one lease and as an assignee of another lessee for the same term of the same premises. Had plaintiffs alleged facts which showed the circumstances under which the two leases came into existence, a cause of action holding defendant liable under either lease might be stated. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Lauterstein v. Nathan Strauss, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 1, 1930
228 App. Div. 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)
Case details for

Lauterstein v. Nathan Strauss, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ABRAHAM LAUTERSTEIN and HARRY SCHACHTER, Doing Business under the Firm…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 1, 1930

Citations

228 App. Div. 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 1930)