Opinion
November, 1922.
Award reversed on the ground that there was no proof that under normal conditions the wages of the claimant would be expected to increase to thirty dollars a week. No costs. All concur.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Lauro v. William Zinseer Co., Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1922
204 App. Div. 854 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)
Summaries of
Lauro v. William Zinseer Co., Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 1, 1922
204 App. Div. 854 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)
Case details for
Lauro v. William Zinseer Co., Inc.
Case Details
Full title:Before STATE INDUSTRIAL BOARD, Respondent. JOSEPH LAURO, Claimant…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Date published: Nov 1, 1922
Citations
204 App. Div. 854 (N.Y. App. Div. 1922)