From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laurito v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Mar 23, 2012
83 So. 3d 980 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 5D11–644.

2012-03-23

Thomas C. LAURITO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Hale R. Stancil, Judge.Thomas C. Laurito, Defuniak Springs, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Hale R. Stancil, Judge.Thomas C. Laurito, Defuniak Springs, pro se. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Although the trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing on Appellant's rule 3.850 motion, it failed to make findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by rule 3.850(d). Accordingly, we reverse and remand this cause with instructions that the trial court make the required findings. Dillbeck v. State, 882 So.2d 969 (Fla.2004).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

MONACO, TORPY and COHEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Laurito v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Mar 23, 2012
83 So. 3d 980 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Laurito v. State

Case Details

Full title:Thomas C. LAURITO, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Mar 23, 2012

Citations

83 So. 3d 980 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)