Lauria v. Nextel of New York, Inc.

Full title: JOHN LAURIA et al., Plaintiffs, v. NEXTEL OF NEW YORK, INC., d/b/a NEXTEL…

Court: United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Feb 28, 2007

CV 05-3437 (ADS) (ARL) (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 28, 2007)

Opinion

CV 05-3437 (ADS) (ARL).

February 28, 2007

ORDER

ARLENE LINDSAY, Magistrate Judge

Before the court is the plaintiffs' letter application dated February 17, 2007 seeking to compel responses to its discovery demands and an extension of the discovery deadline. Defendants oppose the application insofar as it seeks to compel responses and consents to an extension of the discovery deadline. See Strasnick Letter, dated February 22, 2007. The application is denied with leave to renew. The parties have not attempted to confer in good faith as required by Rule 2(A)(1) of the undersigned's individual rules and Local Rule 37.3(A). Accordingly, the parties are directed to meet and confer to address the issues raised by the plaintiffs. Finally, the court declines to extend the June 18, 2007 discovery deadline at this time. The parties may renew this request as the deadline approaches. The renewed application shall include a summary of the discovery items to be completed.

SO ORDERED: