From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laurent v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 12, 1989
542 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-02100.

May 12, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; J. Dale Durrance, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow and Andrea Steffan, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee and Michele Taylor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


Appellant raises two points, one of which has merit. The trial court stated two reasons for departing from the recommended guidelines sentence: the quantity of cocaine involved and the fact that defendant is a drug dealer. Appellant correctly asserts that both of those reasons are inherent components of a conviction for attempted trafficking in cocaine and are, therefore, invalid bases for departure. See Atwaters v. State, 519 So.2d 611 (Fla. 1988); Alexander v. State, 513 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Accordingly, although we affirm the conviction, we reverse and set aside the sentence imposed herein and remand for resentencing within the recommended guidelines range.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded for resentencing.

DANAHY and FRANK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Laurent v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 12, 1989
542 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Laurent v. State

Case Details

Full title:RICO LAURENT, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 12, 1989

Citations

542 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Campbell v. State

This reason is invalid, because being a drug dealer is an inherent component of the crime of drug…