From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laurent v. Herkert

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nov 29, 2006
219 F. App'x 976 (11th Cir. 2006)

Summary

stating that courts look to § 1292(b) for guidance in determining whether to grant leave to appeal under § 158

Summary of this case from Rolta Int'l Inc. v. Fund

Opinion

No. 05-17173.

November 29, 2006.

Appeal from the S.D.Fla., 196 Fed. Appx. 771.


Denial of Rehearing En Banc.


Summaries of

Laurent v. Herkert

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Nov 29, 2006
219 F. App'x 976 (11th Cir. 2006)

stating that courts look to § 1292(b) for guidance in determining whether to grant leave to appeal under § 158

Summary of this case from Rolta Int'l Inc. v. Fund

noting that the standard for granting leave to appeal under § 158 is the same as that under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), and a party must demonstrate that an order presents a controlling question of law; over which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion among courts; and the immediate resolution of the issue would materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation

Summary of this case from Strickland & Davis Int'l, Inc. v. Shepard
Case details for

Laurent v. Herkert

Case Details

Full title:Laurent v. Herkert

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Nov 29, 2006

Citations

219 F. App'x 976 (11th Cir. 2006)

Citing Cases

Wholesalecars.Com v. Leo

See 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b).Laurent v. Herkert , 196 Fed.Appx. 771, 772 (11th Cir. 2006) (per curiam); see alsoIn…

Trauner v. State Bank & Trust Co.

Because § 158 provides no guidance for determining when to exercise this discretion, however, the Eleventh…