From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laurent v. Diltz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 1, 2019
Case No. 3:17-cv-343 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 1, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 3:17-cv-343

08-01-2019

JAYME LAURENT, Plaintiff, v. TROY DILTZ, et al., Defendants.


DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANTS MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MONTGOMERY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS AND SHERIFF ROB STRECK'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS THEIR THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT AGAINST NAPHCARE, INC. (DOC. #52); DISMISSING THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE

On July 10, 2019, Defendants Montgomery County, the Montgomery County Board of Commissioners and Sheriff Rob Streck moved to dismiss their Third-Party Complaint against NaphCare, Inc., Doc. #14, without prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1). Doc. #52. No memoranda in opposition has been filed within the time allotted.

Accordingly, the Court SUSTAINS Defendants' motion, Doc. #52, and DISMISSES the Third-Party Complaint Against NaphCare, Inc., Doc. #14, WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Date: August 1, 2019

/s/_________

WALTER H. RICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Laurent v. Diltz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 1, 2019
Case No. 3:17-cv-343 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 1, 2019)
Case details for

Laurent v. Diltz

Case Details

Full title:JAYME LAURENT, Plaintiff, v. TROY DILTZ, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 1, 2019

Citations

Case No. 3:17-cv-343 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 1, 2019)