From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laumann v. Brinkley (In re Brinkley)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
May 11, 2012
Case No: 10-13359 (Bankr. D. Md. May. 11, 2012)

Opinion

Case No: 10-13359 Adversary No. 10-00549

05-11-2012

In re: JAMES BRINKLEY DIANE BRINKLEY Debtor(s) PHILLIP LAUMANN Plaintiff v. DIANE BRINKLEY Defendant

Mary Albrecht Jordan 7420 Baltimore-Annapolis Boulevard Counsel for the Plaintiff Crystal D. Barnett 14 Crain Highway, SW Counsel for the Defendant


____________


U. S. BANKRUPTCY JUDGE

STIPULATION AND CONSENT ORDER

WHEREAS, on July 16, 2010, Plaintiff, Phillip Laumann ("Laumann") commenced the above-captioned adversary proceeding (the "Action") against the Defendant, Diane Brinkley ("Brinkley");

WHEREAS, on October 14, 2011 this Court entered an Order appointing Marc Baer as a Bankruptcy Dispute Resolution Advocate;

WHEREAS, the parties reached an agreement through dispute resolution on March 14, 2012; and

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the undersigned parties that:

1. Brinkley shall pay Laumann the sum of twelve thousand six hundred dollars ($12,600) beginning April 6, 2012 at the rate of one hundred fifty dollars ($150) per month to be paid monthly for a period of eighty-four (84) months;

2. Should Brinkley become more than thirty (30) days past due, Brinkley shall be in default of the terms of this Stipulation and Consent Order and the amount due from Brinkley to Laumami shall escalate to thirty thousand dollars ($30,000);

3. In the event that Brinkley shall desire to secure a future loan, Laumann agrees to subordinate any amounts due and owing under this Stipulation and Consent Order to other creditors, if necessary;

4. Laumami shall continue his collection efforts to collect certain monies owed to him as a result of judgment in favor of Laumann against Adam Revels ("Revels"); and

5. Should Laumami collect monies from Revels in excess of ten thousand dollars ($10,000), any amounts collected thereafter shall result in a direct credit toward the amount owed by Brinkley for each dollar secured by Laumami from Revels.

Having reviewied the terms and conditions of the Stipulation and Consent Order and finding the terms and conditions contained herein to be reasonable; it is by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland, SO ORDERED.

CONSENTED TO:

____________

Mary Albrecht Jordan

7420 Baltimore-Annapolis Boulevard

Counsel for the Plaintiff

____________

Crystal D. Barnett

14 Crain Highway, SW

Counsel for the Defendant

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the terms of the copy of the Stipulation and Consent Order submitted to the Court are identical to those set forth in the original Stipulation and Consent Order; and the signatures represented by the I si on this copy reference the signatures of consenting parties on the original Stipulation and Consent Order.

Crystal D. Barnett

END OF ORDER


Summaries of

Laumann v. Brinkley (In re Brinkley)

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
May 11, 2012
Case No: 10-13359 (Bankr. D. Md. May. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Laumann v. Brinkley (In re Brinkley)

Case Details

Full title:In re: JAMES BRINKLEY DIANE BRINKLEY Debtor(s) PHILLIP LAUMANN Plaintiff…

Court:UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND

Date published: May 11, 2012

Citations

Case No: 10-13359 (Bankr. D. Md. May. 11, 2012)