From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laulopez v. FineLine Auto. Grp.

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Apr 25, 2024
CIVIL 1:23-cv-1241 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 25, 2024)

Opinion

CIVIL 1:23-cv-1241

04-25-2024

JOSE LAULOPEZ, Plaintiff, v. FINELINE AUTO GROUP, LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

SYLVIA H. RAMBO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2024, upon consideration of the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (Doc. 9) which recommends that this case be dismissed for failure to prosecute, and noting that Plaintiff has not filed objections to the report and recommendation and the time for doing so has passed, and the court having satisfied itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record, Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b), advisory committee notes; see also Univac Dental Co. v. Dentsply Intern., Inc., 702 F.Supp.2d 465, 469 (M.D. Pa. 2010) (explaining that judges should review dispositive legal issues raised by the report for clear error), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. 9) is ADOPTED;
2) This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); and
3) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this case.


Summaries of

Laulopez v. FineLine Auto. Grp.

United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania
Apr 25, 2024
CIVIL 1:23-cv-1241 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Laulopez v. FineLine Auto. Grp.

Case Details

Full title:JOSE LAULOPEZ, Plaintiff, v. FINELINE AUTO GROUP, LLC, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 25, 2024

Citations

CIVIL 1:23-cv-1241 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 25, 2024)