From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laulo v. Rehm

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Oct 22, 1996
932 S.W.2d 862 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 71161

OPINION FILED: October 22, 1996

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, HON. DENNIS J. KEHM.

Mary S. Laulo, Imperial, pro se.

Michael J. Valenti, Hillsboro, for Respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., and James R. Reinhard and Gary M. Gaertner, JJ.



ORDER


Mary S. Laulo (Contestant), pro se, appeals the judgment of the trial court dismissing, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, her challenge to primary election results, § 115.526, RSMo 1994. We affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment of the trial court. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Laulo v. Rehm

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE
Oct 22, 1996
932 S.W.2d 862 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Laulo v. Rehm

Case Details

Full title:MARY S. LAULO, APPELLANT, v. ELEANOR KOCH REHM, RESPONDENT

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE

Date published: Oct 22, 1996

Citations

932 S.W.2d 862 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)