From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laughlin v. Norton

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jul 30, 2024
2:24CV00134-BSM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Jul. 30, 2024)

Opinion

2:24CV00134-BSM-JTK

07-30-2024

CHRISTOPHER DANIEL LAUGHLIN, ADC # 100594 PLAINTIFF v. A. NORTON, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER

JEROME T. KEARNEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Having reviewed Christopher Daniel Laughlin's (“Plaintiff”) Complaint for screening purposes only,the Court finds that service is appropriate with respect to Plaintiff's claims against Defendants A. Norton and J. Palmer.

The Prison Litigation Reform Act requires federal courts to screen prisoner complaints seeking relief against a governmental entity, officer, or employee. 28 U.S.C. Sect. 1915A(a).

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall prepare Summonses for Defendants A. Norton and J. Palmer. The United States Marshal is hereby directed to serve a copy of Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 2) and Summons on each of these Defendants, along with a copy of this Order, without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore. Service on Defendant J. Palmer should be attempted through: Hardin, Jesson & Terry, PLC, Attn: Kirkman Dougherty, 5000 Rogers Avenue, Suite 500, Fort Smith, Arkansas 72903. Service on Defendant A. Norton should be attempted through the ADC Compliance Office, P.O. Box 20550, Pine Bluff, Arkansas 71612. /

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Laughlin v. Norton

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jul 30, 2024
2:24CV00134-BSM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Jul. 30, 2024)
Case details for

Laughlin v. Norton

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER DANIEL LAUGHLIN, ADC # 100594 PLAINTIFF v. A. NORTON, et al…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Jul 30, 2024

Citations

2:24CV00134-BSM-JTK (E.D. Ark. Jul. 30, 2024)