Opinion
2:11-cv-02111-GEB-CKD
10-25-2011
MARY A. LAUENSTEIN, Trustee of the Mary A. Lauenstein Trust Dated December 21, 1988, Plaintiff, v. WORLD SAVINGS BANK, FSB; GOLDEN WEST ASSOCIATION SERVICE COMPANY, a California Corporation; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., A/K/A Wachovia Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., F/K/A Wachovia Mortgage, FSB; NDEX WEST LLC; and DOES 1 through 20, Defendants.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND
CONTINUING STATUS (PRETRIAL
SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE; FED,
R. CIV. P. 4(M) NOTICE
The August 15, 2011 Order Setting Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference scheduled a status conference in this case on November 7, 2011, and required the parties to file a joint status report no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the scheduling conference. The August 15, 2011 Order further required that a status report be filed regardless of whether a joint report could be procured. No status report was filed as ordered.
Therefore, Plaintiff and Defendants World Savings Bank, FSB, Golden West Association Service Company, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., are Ordered to Show Cause ("OSC") in a writing to be filed no later than 4:00 p.m. on November 21, 2011 why sanctions should not be imposed against them and/or their counsel under Rule 16(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to file a timely status report. The written response shall also state whether the parties or their counsel is at fault, and whether a hearing is requested on the OSC. If a hearing is requested, it will be held on January 30, 2012, commencing at 9:00 a.m., just prior to the status conference, which is rescheduled to that date and time. A status report shall be filed no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the status conference.
"If the fault lies with the attorney, that is where the impact of sanction should be lodged. If the fault lies with the clients, that is where the impact of the sanction should be lodged." Matter of Sanction of Baker, 744 F.2d 1438, 1442 (10th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1014 (1985). Sometimes the faults of attorneys, and their consequences, are visited upon clients. In re Hill, 775 F.2d 1385, 1387 (9th Cir. 1985).
Further, Plaintiff is notified under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that if Defendant NDEX West, LLC is not served with process within the 120 day period prescribed in that Rule, it may be dismissed as a defendant. To avoid dismissal, on or before December 9, 2011 Plaintiff shall file proof of service for any unserved defendant or a sufficient explanation why service was not effected within Rule 4(m)'s prescribed service period.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge