From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Laub v. City of Camden

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 26, 1941
20 A.2d 348 (N.J. 1941)

Opinion

Argued May 6, 1941 —

Decided May 26, 1941.

A traffic standard in the center of a public street, no longer used for traffic lights, becomes an obstruction which would be a public nuisance, at least if not properly lighted.

On appeal from a judgment of the District Court of the City of Camden.

Before Justices PARKER, DONGES and COLIE.

For the appellant, John J. Crean ( Edward V. Martino, of counsel).

For the respondent, Carl Kisselman.


Defendant appeals from judgments entered against it in favor of Rebecca Laub for $75; and in favor of William Laub for $8, for damages he sustained incidental to the injuries received by Rebecca Laub, $189.98 the stipulated amount of the damages to his car and $64 for injuries sustained by him in the accident.

The facts are that William Laub was driving his car southerly on Seventh street in the City of Camden. His wife, Rebecca Laub, was a passenger therein. It was late at night, rainy and misty. At the intersection of Market and Seventh streets, the City of Camden had, on the day of the accident, put in operation new traffic lights, one at each corner of the intersection. A former traffic standard located in the center of Seventh street had been left standing and the light removed, but a lighted red lantern had been placed on the standard about seven hours prior to the accident. As the Laub car approached the corner, it was laterally away from the curb because of parked cars. This brought it in line with the traffic standard. Directly ahead, a distance of ten feet, was another car going in the same direction, which car suddenly swerved to the right and before William Laub, the driver, could do the same, he struck the standard. There was testimony from which the District Court Judge, sitting without a jury, could find either that there was no lantern on the standard, or that if there was, it was inadequate.

Appellant urges that there was error in the refusal of the District Court to nonsuit or direct a verdict for the defendant municipality. We think that there was ample testimony in the case from which the court could properly find active wrongdoing and that, therefore, its rulings on the motions to nonsuit and direct a verdict were proper. The need and use of the standard as a support for warning lights having permanently ceased, what remained was simply an obstruction to traffic which would be a public nuisance, at least if not properly lighted. Cochran v. Public Service Electric Co., 97 N.J.L. 480; Allas v. Rumson, 115 Id. 593; Hammond v. County of Monmouth, 117 Id. 11.

We find it unnecessary to pass upon the point raised in appellant's brief as to the plaintiff William Laub having split his cause of action in order to remain within the jurisdiction of the District Court. The error, if any, was harmless as the total of all judgments was under the jurisdictional limit.

The judgments of the District Court are affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Laub v. City of Camden

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 26, 1941
20 A.2d 348 (N.J. 1941)
Case details for

Laub v. City of Camden

Case Details

Full title:REBECCA LAUB AND WILLIAM LAUB, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. CITY OF CAMDEN…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: May 26, 1941

Citations

20 A.2d 348 (N.J. 1941)
20 A.2d 348

Citing Cases

Messier v. City of Clifton

The essential question is whether the parkway in the center of the highway is an obstruction. If so, then the…

Kelley v. Curtiss

n the following cases, the circumstances imply, or the case itself indicates, that the municipality was held…