From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bik Ying Lau v. Yat Tang Ng

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 20, 2003
303 A.D.2d 287 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

572

March 20, 2003.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Judith Gische, J.), entered September 27, 2001, which, in an action for divorce, denied defendant's motion to vacate a default judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Pro Se, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Andrias, Saxe, Williams, JJ.


The order to show cause that initiated the motion, which was mailed by defendant to Supreme Court from prison, directed "Personal Service" on plaintiff's attorney and, since defendant was seeking poor person relief, the Corporation Counsel. Defendant served the order to show cause on plaintiff's attorney by certified mail, but provides no proof of service of any kind on the Corporation Counsel. Even if the certified mail service on plaintiff's attorney were deemed compliant with the order to show cause, either because certified mail is not by definition excluded as a mode of "personal service" (cf. 308[5]), or because plaintiff's confinement in prison and pro se status warrant that he be given some leeway with respect to service (see Sackinger v. Nevins, 114 Misc.2d 454, 459-460, citing Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520; but cf. Goldmark v. Keystone Grading Corp., 226 A.D.2d 143 ), defendant's failure to provide any proof of service on the Corporation Counsel requires denial of the motion.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Bik Ying Lau v. Yat Tang Ng

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 20, 2003
303 A.D.2d 287 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Bik Ying Lau v. Yat Tang Ng

Case Details

Full title:BIK YING LAU, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. YAT TANG NG, Defendant-Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 20, 2003

Citations

303 A.D.2d 287 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
755 N.Y.S.2d 617