From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lau v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California
Mar 12, 2013
No. C 11-01940 MEJ (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2013)

Opinion

No. C 11-01940 MEJ

03-12-2013

DON LAU, Plaintiff, v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA LLC, Defendant.


ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL

BRIEFING

The Court has reviewed Defendant's Supplemental Brief regarding whether the subject vehicle qualifies as a consumer good and whether Plaintiff has standing under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act to proceed with his claim, as well as Plaintiff's response. Dkt. Nos. 71, 73. In advance of the status conference set in this matter, the Court now poses the following questions to Plaintiff. 1. Plaintiff disclosed the "possibility" of a sixth "personal use vehicle" registered to "Don Lau or DT Floormasters, Inc." in Interrogatory Nos. 32 to 39, but stated he was unable to find the registration to confirm how any such sixth vehicle may have been registered. Based on these responses, Defendant asserts that Plaintiff has had six vehicles registered to DT Floormasters during the time period identified in the Interrogatories. What is the accurate number of vehicles registered to "Don Lau or DT Floormasters, Inc." for each of the time periods identified in Interrogatory Nos. 32 to 39? 2. Plaintiff asserts that "the relevant time period for counting how many vehicles are registered should be at the time of initial purchase." What is Plaintiff's authority for this statement? 3. Plaintiff asserts that the Court should "only consider those vehicles that are primarily used for business purposes" in considering whether and how many vehicles apply towards the "not more than five motor vehicles" registered to DT Floormasters, Inc. What authority does Plaintiff have to support this construction of the statue? 4. Has Plaintiff completed the filing of his revised corporate and personal income tax statements for the years 2007 to 2012 such that the subject Mercedes vehicle is now reflected as a personal-use vehicle? If so, how is the vehicle currently registered and titled?

Plaintiff shall file a brief responding to each of these questions by March 15, 2013. Defendant may file a response by March 19, 2013, but such response is optional.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________

Maria-Elena James

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Lau v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California
Mar 12, 2013
No. C 11-01940 MEJ (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Lau v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLC

Case Details

Full title:DON LAU, Plaintiff, v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA LLC, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California

Date published: Mar 12, 2013

Citations

No. C 11-01940 MEJ (N.D. Cal. Mar. 12, 2013)