From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lau v. Mayorkas

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 1, 2024
21-cv-04756-TLT (TSH) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2024)

Opinion

21-cv-04756-TLT (TSH)

08-01-2024

BRANDON LAU, Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Defendant.


DISCOVERY ORDER

THOMAS S. HIXSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court held a discovery hearing on July 30, 2024. Plaintiff objected to some of the redactions in Defendant's document productions. The Court construed that argument as a motion to compel the production of unredacted documents and denied it as untimely under the then-existing case schedule. However, as there was a pending motion to modify the case schedule, the Court stated that if fact discovery is reopened, either side may raise discovery issues. ECF No. 129.

Thereafter, Judge Thompson modified the case schedule. The new close of fact discovery is September 12, 2024. ECF No. 127. As discovery has now been reopened, Plaintiff's objection to Defendant's redactions is now a timely discovery dispute. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the parties to meet and confer regarding the redacted documents. If they are not able to resolve their dispute, the Court ORDERS them to file a joint discovery letter brief, not to exceed five pages, setting forth their respective arguments.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lau v. Mayorkas

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 1, 2024
21-cv-04756-TLT (TSH) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2024)
Case details for

Lau v. Mayorkas

Case Details

Full title:BRANDON LAU, Plaintiff, v. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 1, 2024

Citations

21-cv-04756-TLT (TSH) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 1, 2024)