From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Latusek v. Mosam Corporation

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 29, 1966
196 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 1966)

Opinion

No. 35366.

November 9, 1966. Rehearing Denied November 29, 1966.

Writ of Certiorari to Florida Industrial Commission.

Charles F. Lindsay and Allen Clements, Miami, for petitioner.

Andrew L. Richard, Jr., Edwin H. Underwood, Jr., Wakefield Underwood, Miami, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date March 22, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney's fees filed by Petitioner is also denied.

THORNAL, C.J., and THOMAS, ROBERTS, DREW and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Latusek v. Mosam Corporation

Supreme Court of Florida
Nov 29, 1966
196 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 1966)
Case details for

Latusek v. Mosam Corporation

Case Details

Full title:ALYCE ANN LATUSEK, PETITIONER, v. MOSAM CORPORATION, THE HOME INDEMNITY…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Nov 29, 1966

Citations

196 So. 2d 114 (Fla. 1966)