From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Latu v. McFadden

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 1, 2021
2:20-CV-1518-WBS-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-CV-1518-WBS-DMC-P

12-01-2021

SAMUEL LATU, Plaintiff, v. McFADDEN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

DENNIS M. COTA, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On September 16, 2021, Plaintiff filed his second amended complaint without signing it. ECF No. 28, pgs. 3, 9, and 20. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides:

Every pleading, written motion, and other paper must be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney's name-or by a party personally if the party is unrepresented. . . . The court must strike an unsigned paper unless the omission is promptly corrected after being called to the attorney's or party's attention.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a); see also Local Rule 131(b).

Because Plaintiff did not sign his second amended complaint, it is stricken. Plaintiff is directed to file a signed second amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Latu v. McFadden

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 1, 2021
2:20-CV-1518-WBS-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Latu v. McFadden

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL LATU, Plaintiff, v. McFADDEN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 1, 2021

Citations

2:20-CV-1518-WBS-DMC-P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2021)