From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Latta v. Wiley

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 21, 2013
106 A.D.3d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-05-21

In re Douglas LATTA, Petitioner, v. Hon. Maxwell J. WILEY, etc., et al., Respondents.

Douglas Latta, petitioner pro se. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (John T. Bandler of counsel), for John T. Bandler, respondent.


Douglas Latta, petitioner pro se. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (John T. Bandler of counsel), for John T. Bandler, respondent.

The above-named petitioner having presented applications to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, and for related relief,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the applications be and the same hereby are denied, and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

MAZZARELLI, J.P., SWEENY, FREEDMAN, GISCHE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Latta v. Wiley

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 21, 2013
106 A.D.3d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

Latta v. Wiley

Case Details

Full title:In re Douglas LATTA, Petitioner, v. Hon. Maxwell J. WILEY, etc., et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 21, 2013

Citations

106 A.D.3d 567 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 3601
964 N.Y.S.2d 909