From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Latta v. Hockmeyer

Supreme Court, Trial Term, Nassau County
Dec 18, 1956
5 Misc. 2d 175 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1956)

Opinion

December 18, 1956

Golden, Lefkowitz Rapport for Marie Pastore and another, plaintiffs.

Lendenbaum Young, for Katie R. Latta and another, plaintiffs.

Jesse Dillon for Charles W. Latta, plaintiff.

McCarthy McGrath for John Madison, defendant.

Bernard Helfenstein for William Hockmeyer, defendant.


Motion for a preference in the trial of an action for personal injuries.

The papers submitted do not disclose that a jury was waived "by stipulation filed with the calendar clerk or by any other mode prescribed by statute (Civil Practice Act, § 426)" as required by rule 7 of the Nassau County Supreme Court Rules for trial terms. Therefore, a preference may not be granted under the aforesaid rule 7.

With respect to a preference under rule 151 of the Rules of Civil Practice, it must also be held that the papers submitted are inadequate.

The plaintiff has not submitted (1) the pleadings (2) an affidavit of merits (3) an affidavit of a physician averring that it is unlikely the plaintiff movant will live until the trial of the cause in its regular order or (4) an affidavit of the plaintiff sufficiently disclosing her economic status.

Accordingly, the application for a preference will be denied without prejudice to a renewal upon proper papers.


Summaries of

Latta v. Hockmeyer

Supreme Court, Trial Term, Nassau County
Dec 18, 1956
5 Misc. 2d 175 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1956)
Case details for

Latta v. Hockmeyer

Case Details

Full title:KATIE R. LATTA et al., Plaintiffs, v. WILLIAM HOCKMEYER et al., Defendants

Court:Supreme Court, Trial Term, Nassau County

Date published: Dec 18, 1956

Citations

5 Misc. 2d 175 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1956)
164 N.Y.S.2d 329