Opinion
Case No. 11-cv-11086
04-23-2014
JENNIFER LATOWSKI, Plaintiff, v. NORTHWOODS NURSING CENTER, Defendant.
Honorable Thomas L. Ludington
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
In February 2014, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed in part this Court's order granting summary judgment to Defendant Northwoods on all of Plaintiff Latowski's claims. Specifically, the Sixth Circuit reversed the grant of summary judgment on Latowski's Pregnancy Discrimination Act claim and remanded for further proceedings. In accordance with the Sixth Circuit's mandate, this Court issued an order reopening the case and providing a scheduling order. See ECF No. 50.
On April 10, 2014, Northwoods filed a Motion to Stay Proceedings. Northwoods notes that there is a petition for writ of certiorari pending before the United States Supreme Court in a similar case—Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 12-1226. Northwoods asserts that, if the Supreme Court were to grant certiorari in Young, the outcome of that case would be dispositive on the instant proceedings in this Court. Northwoods explains that, for purposes of Latowski's Pregnancy Discrimination Act claim, "the [Sixth Circuit], relying on Ensley-Gaines, held that the relevant question is not whether the plaintiff and comparator employees were similarly situated in all respects but whether they were similarly situated 'in their ability to work.'" Mot. to Stay 3-4, ECF No. 52. However, the Fourth Circuit expressly disagreed with Ensley-Gaines's analysis, instead following the conclusions of three other circuits: "[I]t is unsurprising that no other circuit has followed Ensley-Gaines. We are similarly compelled to disagree with its analysis." Id. at 7.
Ensley-Gaines v. Runyon, 100 F.3d 1220 (6th Cir. 1996).
Thus, Northwoods contends, the Sixth Circuit's holding in Ensley-Gaines—which is controlling in the instant litigation—is in direct conflict with Young and three other circuits. And if the Supreme Court were to adopt Young's holding, "it likely would invalidate Ensley-Gaines, and thus the Sixth Circuit's holding in this matter. According to Northwoods, staying the proceedings in this case until the Supreme Court has made a decision in Young would avoid wasting time and resources. The Court agrees that judicial economy would be best served by entering a stay in the instant litigation.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED Defendant's Motion to Stay Proceedings (ECF No. 51 and 52) is GRANTED.
It is further ORDERED that this matter is STAYED pending the Supreme Court's decision to grant or deny certiorari in Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 12-1226.
It is further ORDERED that the parties are DIRECTED to notify the Court when the Supreme Court has reached a decision regarding a grant or denial of certiorari in Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 12-1226.
___________________
THOMAS L. LUDINGTON
United States District Judge
PROOF OF SERVICE
The undersigned certifies that a copy of the foregoing order was served upon each attorney or party of record herein by electronic means or first class U.S. mail on April 23, 2014.
___________________
TRACY A. JACOBS