From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Latona v. Latona

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 23, 1994
210 A.D.2d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

December 23, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Whelan, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Wesley, Callahan, Doerr and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Attorney's fees should not be awarded without conducting a hearing or requiring proof by affidavit substantiating the attorney's fees requested (see, Cooper v Cooper, 179 A.D.2d 1035; Kieffer v Kieffer, 163 A.D.2d 907, 908; Falcone v Falcone, 112 A.D.2d 796, 797). Defendant did not request a hearing. The parties refer to an attorney's affidavit in their briefs, but such affidavit is not in the record. We, therefore, modify the judgment appealed from by vacating the thirty-first and thirty-second decretal paragraphs and remit the matter to Supreme Court for a determination regarding attorney's fees based upon proper proof.

We otherwise affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Whelan, J.).


Summaries of

Latona v. Latona

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Dec 23, 1994
210 A.D.2d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Latona v. Latona

Case Details

Full title:JUDENE M. LATONA, Respondent, v. C. THOMAS LATONA, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Dec 23, 1994

Citations

210 A.D.2d 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
621 N.Y.S.2d 973

Citing Cases

Moses v. Moses

81 be credited to defendant before the marital estate is distributed ( see, Burns v Burns, 193 AD2d 1104,…

Matthews v. Matthews

Because the divorce was improperly granted, those parts of the judgment that directed distribution of the…